Nmp Lawsuit Timeline, Cheating Claims and Courtroom Conflicts Explained

The distinction between transparency and spectacle becomes perilously thin when private lives fall apart in front of thousands of people. Malena Tudi and Nick “Nmplol” Polom were more than just streaming partners; they had been secretly married since 2015. This information only came to light after their divorce documents were filed with the Travis County court system.

From the outside, their separation, which was formally announced in September 2024, may have appeared amicable. However, Malena’s court filing in January 2025 told a very different tale. She claimed that Nick had undermined her independence, controlled her finances, and restricted her access to money in order to consolidate power. The majority of their Twitch followers were in disbelief. Many were legally married without even realizing it.

Malena said she had little control over their finances during their marriage. Nick’s accounts were credited with her paychecks. She needed his approval before making significant purchases. He allegedly threatened to lower her share of the joint estate if she didn’t agree to terms of a private settlement when their relationship started to fall apart. There was tension outside the house as well. Their audience, their brand, and their social networks were all affected.

But Amsterdam was what made it all worse.

Nick reportedly went to TwitchCon in the Netherlands while Malena was in Spain tending to her sick mother. She said she discovered explicit messages and pictures that suggested infidelity when he came back. For his part, Nick called the charges “unequivocally false.” Nevertheless, the harm to their already delicate relationship—and public image—was instantaneous.

I recall seeing one of Nick’s initial streams following the announcement of their breakup. His voice was calm but clearly strained as he carefully removed pictures from the wall. At the time, it felt genuine and unfiltered. Looking back, it seems more like a controlled message, with one half of the story told in high definition.

Malena provided the other half through court filings rather than videos. Her answer was harsh. Even as he made fun of her absence on stream, she claimed Nick coerced her into signing a non-disclosure agreement. He later removed a tweet that made fun of her and his own mother for assuming he wouldn’t make it through the split. He wrote, “Jokes on them.” “I am alive and doing well.”

However, the joke had a different impact on people who perceived it as a component of a larger power disparity.

Nick’s legal team filed a motion to seal the court documents in April 2025, citing excessive public scrutiny. Malena’s group protested. While Nick persisted in influencing the conversation on social media and livestreams, she contended that sealing the records would silence her. The case was temporarily sealed by the judge for ninety days, but by that time, a number of documents had already gone viral on the internet.

The disagreement became financial and technical. Malena’s team asked for information on everything from OTK equity to Twitch revenue splits to cryptocurrency assets. Nick’s lawyers objected, describing the requests as “overly burdensome.” Malena contended that she was unable to obtain a just distribution of property, including the house, which is currently valued at more than $1 million, in the absence of complete financial transparency.

For many of her fans, this was about economic justice, especially in partnerships where one person has all the power, rather than just being famous on Twitch. Viewers were moved by her allegations of financial abuse, particularly women in the streaming community who had subtly encountered comparable situations.

Then older Twitch clips reappeared, seemingly straight out of a Netflix script. A particularly eerie scene featured Malena singing “The Angel and the One” by Weezer just a few weeks prior to their breakup. She crooned, “You’re already the voice inside my head.” In old VODs, fans started analyzing every sentence, every pause, and every look. Did it hint at something? Or were we only getting started?

Malena has virtually completely withdrawn from the public eye since the lawsuit. Her streams vanished. She now makes her statements through court motions, which are remarkably personal despite their careful wording. Nick, on the other hand, has continued to be active. He occasionally makes jokes about stress. At other times, he simply stays away from the subject.

Ironically, the silence has evolved into a different kind of narrative.

Now, more than just a home or bank account is on the line. It’s the tale that each side wishes to forget. In particular, if the accusations of financial abuse are confirmed, Malena’s team is advocating for fair division. That might result in more than a 50/50 split in Texas. That result would subtly but unmistakably convey a message about accountability, respect, and pay for a ten-year-long digital career.

Confusion surrounding the acronym “NMP” persists in the meantime. The case is mistaken for a legal dispute involving the real estate magazine National Mortgage Professional by some internet users, especially those in the finance industry. It’s a strange coincidence that makes sense in its own right. The main themes of both stories are ownership, leverage, and weak systems.

New revelations will be made in the upcoming months due to court deadlines. Motions will be escalated or settled. Attorneys, footnotes, and court transcripts will now be the means of communication between two individuals who used to laugh side by side for millions. That change has a very human—and unquestionably depressing—quality.

However, there might also be something helpful. It serves as a reminder to viewers, particularly those who are creating lives online, that it is rarely easy or painless to separate your personal and professional identities after they have been combined for financial gain.